Tags: greta christina, why are atheist angry? |
Categories: Articles, Atheist, Catholicism, Christianity, Evolution, God, Islam, Jesus, Judaism, Mormonism
Posted by
Christina on
7/9/2009 4:55 AM |
Comments (8)
Stumbled across a very good article on Greta Christina's Blog.
Excerpt:
"I want to talk about atheists and anger. This has been a hard piece to write, and it may be a hard one to
read. I'm not going to be as polite and good-tempered as I usually am
in this blog; this piece is about anger, and for once I'm going to
fucking well let myself be angry. But I think it's important. One of the most common criticisms lobbed
at the newly-vocal atheist community is, "Why do you have to be so
angry?" So I want to talk about:
1. Why atheists are angry;
2. Why our anger is valid, valuable, and necessary;
And 3. Why it's completely fucked-up to try to take our anger away from us."
....
"I'm angry that atheist soldiers -- in the U.S. armed forces -- have had prayer ceremonies pressured on them and atheist meetings broken up by Christian superior officers, in direct violation of the First Amendment."
....
"I'm angry that women are dying of AIDS in Africa and South America
because the Catholic Church has convinced them that using condoms makes
baby Jesus cry."
....
"I'm angry about what happened to Galileo. Still. And I'm angry that it took the Catholic Church until 1992 to apologize for it."
....
"I'm angry -- enraged -- at the priests who molest children and tell
them it's God's will. I'm enraged at the Catholic Church that
consciously, deliberately, repeatedly, for years, acted to protect
priests who molested children, and consciously and deliberately acted
to keep it a secret, placing the Church's reputation as a higher
priority than, for fuck's sake, children not being molested. And I'm
enraged that the Church is now trying to argue, in court, that
protecting child-molesting priests from prosecution, and shuffling
those priests from diocese to diocese so they can molest kids in a
whole new community that doesn't yet suspect them, is a Constitutionally protected form of free religious expression."
Rad the full article here.
Source: http://gretachristina.typepad.com
Currently rated 5.0 by 1 people
- Currently 5/5 Stars.
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
Check it out here.
Source: http://awesomepedia.org/
Currently rated 5.0 by 2 people
- Currently 5/5 Stars.
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
Here is another article about Nazi regime and atheism... Oh, and throw the Commies in there too.
German Bishop Links Nazi Crimes to Atheism
By Markus Becker
"In an Easter sermon that has
drawn widespread criticism, the Catholic bishop of Augsburg has linked
the crimes committed under Nazi and Communist regimes to atheism.
Atheist groups have reacted with fury and accuse the cleric of
rewriting history.
A Catholic German bishop has come under fire for his remarks
condemning atheists. In a sermon given on Easter Sunday, the bishop of
Augsburg, Walter Mixa, warned of rising atheism in Germany. "Wherever
God is denied or fought against, there people and their dignity will
soon be denied and held in disregard," he said in the sermon. He also
said that "a society without God is hell on earth" and quoted the
Russian author Fyodor Dostoyevsky: "If God does not exist, everything
is permitted."
Most controversially, he linked the Nazi and Communist crimes to
atheism. "In the last century, the godless regimes of Nazism and
Communism, with their penal camps, their secret police and their mass
murder, proved in a terrible way the inhumanity of atheism in
practice." Christians and the Church were always the subject of
"special persecution" under these systems, he said.
However, critics accuse Mixa of rewriting history. The bishop's
claim that humanity automatically arises from religious faith is
"totally untenable," Rudolf Ladwig, president of the Germany-based
International League of Non-Religious and Atheists (IBKA), told SPIEGEL
ONLINE. Mixa's words are part of a "long-term strategy by the Church to
exculpate, in a historically inaccurate way, the history of its own
institution as relates to fascism."
The Nazi dictatorship targeted Communists, Social Democrats,
liberals, trade unionists, Jews, Roma and Sinti, homosexuals, the
disabled and others, Ladwig said. "It was by no means the dictatorship
of a dedicated atheist movement. Resistance from within the churches
came only from individuals."
The philosopher Michael Schmidt-Salomon, head of the humanist
non-profit group the Giordano Bruno Foundation, also sharply criticized
Mixa. "If you bear in mind that during the Nazi era it was precisely
the Jews who were accused of being godless, then one sees how
perfidious Mixa's reasoning is," he told SPIEGEL ONLINE. He points out
that freethinker associations were disbanded by the Nazis and avowed
atheists were persecuted.
Mixa's claim that the Nazi regime was "godless" is "a massive
distortion of history," Schmidt-Salomon said. Nazi ideology --
including its anti-Semitism -- was based largely on Christian
traditions, he said, explaining that evidence for that can be found in
Hitler's "Mein Kampf" and elsewhere. "The majority of the Nazi elite
saw themselves as Christians," says Schmidt-Salomon.
Although the Nazi movement included a wide variety of currents of
religious thought, ranging from nihilism to neo-paganism to Teutonic
mythology to Hinduism, atheism played no significant political role for
the Nazis. Avowed atheists were not welcome in the Nazi party or the SS.
The relationship of the Catholic Church to the Nazis was also an
ambivalent one. Individual members of the clergy openly confronted the
regime, which in some cases resulted in their persecution and murder.
Others voluntarily collaborated with the dictatorship, while most
simply did nothing. A systematic persecution of Christians did not take
place in the Third Reich -- let alone the "special persecution of
Christians and the Church" which Mixa spoke of.
Both the diocese of Augsburg and the German Bishops' Conference
declined to comment on the sermon and the criticism when contacted by
SPIEGEL ONLINE.
The Easter sermon was not the first time that Mixa has made
comparisons to Nazism for rhetorical purposes. In February, the bishop
compared the number of Jews murdered during the Holocaust with the
number of abortions performed over the past decades, according to a
newspaper report. The bishop's spokesman also responded to criticism of
Mixa from Germany's leading Green Party politician, Claudia Roth, who
called the bishop a "crazy über-fundamentalist," by comparing her words
to Nazi propaganda.
Mixa has also courted controversy on other issues. In 2007, he
criticized a proposal to expand daycare in Germany by saying it would turn women into "breeding machines." Later that same year, he was criticized by the Jewish community in Germany when he compared the situation of the Palestinians
to the Warsaw Ghetto.
According to the Federal Statistical Office, approximately one-third
of all Germans do not belong to an organized religion. A 2005 survey
conducted by AP-Ipsos showed that only 22 percent of Germans have no
doubt about the existence of God, while some 23 percent of Germans
identify themselves either as atheists or agnostics."
Source: http://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/0,1518,618746,00.html
Be the first to rate this post
- Currently 0/5 Stars.
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
Dr. Laura Schlessinger is a radio personality who dispenses
advice to people who call in to her radio show. Recently, she said
that, as an observant Orthodox Jew, homosexuality is an abomination
according to Leviticus 18:22 and cannot be condoned under any
circumstance. The following is an open letter to Dr. Laura penned by a
east coast resident, which was posted on the Internet. It's funny, as
well as informative:
Dear Dr. Laura:
Thank you for doing so much to educate people regarding God's Law. I
have learned a great deal from your show, and try to share that
knowledge with as many people as I can. When someone tries to defend
the homosexual lifestyle, for example, I simply remind them that
Leviticus 18:22 clearly states it to be an abomination. End of debate.
I do need some advice from you, however, regarding some of the other
specific laws and how to follow them:
When I burn a bull on the altar as a sacrifice, I know it creates a
pleasing odor for the Lord - Lev.1:9. The problem is my neighbors. They
claim the odor is not pleasing to them. Should I smite them?
I would like to sell my daughter into slavery, as sanctioned in
Exodus 21:7. In this day and age, what do you think would be a fair
price for her?
I know that I am allowed no contact with a woman while she is in her
period of menstrual uncleanliness - Lev.15:19- 24. The problem is, how
do I tell? I have tried asking, but most women take offense.
Lev. 25:44 states that I may indeed possess slaves, both male and
female, provided they are purchased from neighboring nations. A friend
of mine claims that this applies to Mexicans, but not Canadians. Can
you clarify? Why can't I own Canadians?
I have a neighbor who insists on working on the Sabbath. Exodus 35:2
clearly states he should be put to death. Am I morally obligated to
kill him myself?
A friend of mine feels that even though eating shellfish is an
abomination - Lev. 11:10, it is a lesser abomination than
homosexuality. I don't agree. Can you settle this?
Lev. 21:20 states that I may not approach the altar of God if I have
a defect in my sight. I have to admit that I wear reading glasses. Does
my vision have to be 20/20, or is there some wiggle room here?
Most of my male friends get their hair trimmed, including the hair
around their temples, even though this is expressly forbidden by Lev.
19:27. How should they die?
I know from Lev. 11:6-8 that touching the skin of a dead pig makes me unclean, but may I still play football if I wear gloves?
My uncle has a farm. He violates Lev. 19:19 by planting two
different crops in the same field, as does his wife by wearing garments
made of two different kinds of thread (cotton/polyester blend). He also
tends to curse and blaspheme a lot. Is it really necessary that we go
to all the trouble of getting the whole town together to stone them? -
Lev.24:10-16. Couldn't we just burn them to death at a private family
affair like we do with people who sleep with their in-laws? (Lev. 20:14)
I know you have studied these things extensively, so I am confident
you can help. Thank you again for reminding us that God's word is
eternal and unchanging.
Your devoted fan,
Jim
Source: http://www.humanistsofutah.org/2002/WhyCantIOwnACanadian_10-02.html
Currently rated 5.0 by 2 people
- Currently 5/5 Stars.
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5